🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering parallel measures.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". Legislation may be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to pass a law lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and suitable for young users," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with additional time needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring parental consent for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various politicians to mimic Australia's path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Beyond these regions, further countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to wait for platforms to self-regulate.